Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by McGrath, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by McGrath, C. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Personality
Right arrow Psychophysiology
Psychosomatic Medicine 62:17-25 (2000)
© 2000 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Hostile Attitudes Predict Elevated Vascular Resistance During Interpersonal Stress in Men and Women

Mary C. Davis, PhD, Karen A. Matthews, PhD and Claire E. McGrath, MA

From the Department of Psychology (M.C.D., C.M.), Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; and Department of Psychiatry (K.A.M.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Address reprint requests to: Mary C. Davis, PhD, Department of Psychology, Box 871104, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104. Email: mary.davis{at}asu.edu

OBJECTIVE: Existing research indicates that hostility is associated with enhanced blood pressure responses during social stress, but little is known about the hemodynamic patterns underlying these blood pressure increases, particularly in women. The present study examined hemodynamic responses to a low-anger interpersonal stressor, testing the hypotheses that hostile individuals show enhanced vascular responses and that low hostile individuals show enhanced myocardial responses.

METHODS: Eighty undergraduate men and women were categorized as high or low in hostility on the basis of median splits of Cook-Medley Hostility Scale scores. Participants discussed a controversial topic with a confederate who disagreed with them, and hemodynamic responses were assessed with impedance cardiography.

RESULTS: High hostile individuals exhibited greater increases in diastolic blood pressure and total peripheral resistance and smaller increases in cardiac output during an interpersonal stressor than did low hostile individuals. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate increases were greater among high hostile relative to low hostile females and comparable among low and high hostile males. Affective responses and task perceptions were generally similar for high and low hostile participants, but the relationship between task perception and hemodynamic responses varied on the basis of hostility level.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that hostility in both men and women is associated with heightened vascular and dampened cardiac responsivity to interpersonal stress that is not deliberately anger provoking. Moreover, they indicate that the associations between task perception and hemodynamic responses vary between high and low hostile individuals.

Key Words: hostility • interpersonalstress • sex • cardiovascular reactivity.

Abbreviations: ANCOVA = analysis of covariance; ANOVA = analysis ofvariance; BP = blood pressure; CHD = coronary heart disease; CO = cardiac output; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; Ho= Cook-Medley Hostility Scale score; HR = heart rate; SBP =systolic blood pressure; TPR = total peripheral resistance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
L. M. Christian and C. M. Stoney
Social Support Versus Social Evaluation: Unique Effects on Vascular and Myocardial Response Patterns
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2006; 68(6): 914 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
S. Carrere, D. Yoshimoto, A. Mittmann, E. M. Woodin, A. Tabares, J. Ullman, C. Swanson, and M. Hawkins
The Roles of Marriage and Anger Dysregulation in Biobehavioral Stress Responses
Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2005; 7(1): 30 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
S. H. Boyle, R. B. Williams, D. B. Mark, B. H. Brummett, I. C. Siegler, M. J. Helms, and J. C. Barefoot
Hostility as a Predictor of Survival in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2004; 66(5): 629 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
U. Christensen, R. Lund, M. T. Damsgaard, B. E. Holstein, S. Ditlevsen, F. Diderichsen, P. Due, L. Iversen, and J. Lynch
Cynical Hostility, Socioeconomic Position, Health Behaviors, and Symptom Load: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in a Danish Population-Based Study
Psychosom Med, July 1, 2004; 66(4): 572 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. S. Thomas, R. A. Nelesen, and J. E. Dimsdale
Relationships Between Hostility, Anger Expression, and Blood Pressure Dipping in an Ethnically Diverse Sample
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2004; 66(3): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Psychosomatic Society