Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online before print November 3, 2008, 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318189a920
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberge, M.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Marchand, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberge, M.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Marchand, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Right arrow Coronary Artery Disease
Psychosomatic Medicine 70:1028-1034 (2008)
© 2008 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Acute Stress Disorder After Myocardial Infarction: Prevalence and Associated Factors

Marie-Anne Roberge, PhD, Gilles Dupuis, PhD and André Marchand, PhD

From the Department of Psychology (M.-A.R., G.D., A.M.), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine (M.-A.R., G.D.), Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre d'Étude du Trauma, (A.M.) Centre de Recherche Fernand-Séguin de I'Hôpital Louis-H. Lafontaine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Gilles Dupuis, Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, PO Box 8888, Dowtown Station, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3P8, Canada. E-mail: dupuis.gilles{at}uqam.ca

Objective: To examine the prevalence of acute stress disorder (ASD) after a myocardial infarction (MI) and the factors associated with its development.

Methods: Of 1344 MI patients admitted to three Canadian hospitals, 474 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria and 393 declined participation in the study; 477 patients consented to participate in the study. A structured interview and questionnaires were administered to patients 48 hours to 14 days post MI (mean ± standard deviation = 4 ± 2.73 days).

Results: Four percent were classified as having ASD using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, ASD module. The presence of symptoms of depression (Beck Depression Inventory; odds ratio (OR) = 29.92) and the presence of perceived distress during the MI (measured using the question "How difficult/upsetting was the experience of your MI?"; OR = 3.42, R2 = .35) were associated with the presence of symptoms of ASD on the Modified PTSD Symptom Scale. The intensity of the symptoms of depression was associated with the intensity of ASD symptoms (R = .65). The models for the detection and estimation of ASD symptoms were validated by applying the regression equations to 72 participants not included in the initial regressions. The results obtained in the validation sample did not differ from those obtained in the initial sample.

Conclusions: The symptoms of depression and the subjective distress during the MI could be used to improve the detection of ASD.

Key Words: acute stress disorder • myocardial infarction • prevalence • risk factor

Abbreviations: ASD = acute stress disorder; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; MI = myocardial infarction; DSM-IV-TR = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision; SCID-IV-ASD = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; MPSS-SR = Modified PTSD Symptom Scale—Self-Report; BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition; LESS = Life Events Stress Scale; M-MSSS = Modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey; BMI = body mass index.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Psychosomatic Society