Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawlor, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Najman, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawlor, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Najman, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Class
Right arrow Exercise
Right arrow Pediatrics
Right arrow Cognitive Functioning
Right arrow Blood Pressure
Right arrow Coronary Artery Disease

Socioeconomic Position, Cognitive Function, and Clustering of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adolescence: Findings From the Mater University Study of Pregnancy and Its Outcomes

Debbie A. Lawlor, PhD, Michael J. O’Callaghan, MD, Abdullah A. Mamun, PhD, Gail M. Williams, PhD, William Bor, PhD and Jake M. Najman, PhD

From the Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, U.K. (D.A.L.); Child Development and Rehabilitation Services, Mater Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia (M.J.O., W.B.); the School of Population Health, University of Queensland Medical School, Brisbane, Australia (A.A.M., G.M.W., J.M.N.); and the School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia (J.M.N.).



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Ratio of observed-to-expected prevalence of adolescents with different numbers of risk factors for all participants and by sex. All graphs have same scale on Y axis for comparison. The dashed horizontal line on each graph shows the null (1.0) value of no difference between observed and expected.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Ratio of observed-to-expected prevalence of adolescents with different numbers of risk factors by family income. All graphs have same scale on Y axis for comparison. The dashed horizontal line on each graph shows the null (1.0) value of no difference between observed and expected.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Ratio of observed-to-expected prevalence of adolescents with different numbers of risk factors by different measures of cognitive function at age 14. All graphs have same scale on Y axis for comparison. The dashed horizontal line on each graph shows the null (1.0) value of no difference between observed and expected.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Psychosomatic Society