Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online before print June 7, 2007, 10.1097/psy.0b013e318068de1d
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchman, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchman, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Aging
Right arrow Musculoskeletal
Right arrow Cognitive Functioning

Frailty is Associated With Incident Alzheimer’s Disease and Cognitive Decline in the Elderly

Aron S. Buchman, MD, Patricia A. Boyle, PhD, Robert S. Wilson, PhD, Yuxiao Tang, PhD and David A. Bennett, MD

From the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center (A.S.B., P.A.B., R.S.W., D.A.B.), Rush University Medical Center; Department of Neurological Sciences (A.S.B., R.S.W., D.A.B.), Rush University Medical Center; Department of Behavioral Science (P.A.B., R.S.W.), Rush University Medical Center; Rush Institute for Healthy Aging and Department of Internal Medicine (Y.T.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.


Figure 113
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Frailty and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). A. Baseline frailty. This figure shows the cumulative hazard of AD during the study for two participants: The first has low baseline frailty, i.e., better performance, measured at baseline (solid line; 10th percentile: –0.75 frailty units) and a second with high baseline frailty, i.e., poorer performance (dotted line; 90th percentile: 0.68 frailty units), adjusted for age, gender, and education. B. Annual rate of change in frailty. This figure shows the cumulative hazard of AD during the study for two participants: The first has a mildly decreasing rate of change in frailty, i.e., improving performance (solid line; 10th percentile: –0.20 frailty units/year) and a second with a rapidly increasing rate of change in frailty, i.e., deteriorating performance (dotted line; 90th percentile: 0.39 frailty units/year), adjusted for age, gender, education, and baseline frailty.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Psychosomatic Society